Whoa. Where to start on Saturday's game?
For the first two innings we looked great. We hit the ball, we ran the bases, we made the Red Sox' pitchers throw strikes (which they couldn't very well do in the wind). We led 8-1.
But in the top of the third everything that could go wrong, did go wrong:
- The Red Sox got a line drive hit that was about two feet to the left of our shortstop. He made a diving attempt, but if a 10-year-old makes that play, it's exceptional.
- We dropped a pop-up early in the inning that the wind moved around.
- The umpire refused to call runner interference when crashed into our shortstop on a groundball, saying the SS did nothing to "avoid contact." (More on this below.)
- Our best pitcher got his leg stepped on on a play at home and had to come out of the game.
- Our reliever couldn't find the strike zone and by the time the starter walked off the leg injury, two more runners were on base.
- We dropped another pop up with two out, allowing two more runs to score.
Had we been able to make the "easy" plays, we would have won the game. And we'll spend some time in practice on Monday catching pop-ups.
The umpire's refusal to call the interference was devastating. Perhaps he got confused and thought he was refereeing pro basketball and that his options were block, charge or no call. But that is clearly not the case, and the rulebook is clear on the matter:
"Offensive interference is an act by the team at bat which interferes with, obstructs, impedes, hinders or confuses any fielder attempting to make a play."
The defender trying to make a play on the ball has the right to the area and it's the responsibility of the runner to not interfere. It's not a matter of both having a right to the same spot at the same time. The defender must cede the right of way.
At the time the bases were loaded, making the correct enforcement of the play slightly problematic, but only in respect to the runner on first. No matter what else, the runner on second should have been called out and the runner on third should have been sent back to third and not allowed to score. The batter should have been awarded a single.
Now, the tricky part, I think the runner at first should have been awarded second, in essence, being forced to advance. I say this because the interference did not circumvent a double play, and it would not have been fair to the Red Sox to call the batter out, the way it would have had to called in a higher level of baseball. The batter can not be allowed to return to bat, since he put the ball in play into fair territory. The runner at first could not be left at first and did nothing to justify his being called out, though he did benefit from the interference because he could not, then, be forced at second.
Personally, I think the ump was not alert enough to make any call, thus he made no call. At the least, the runner had to be called out. Had he called the runner out and allowed the others to advance, I would have been unhappy, but I would have accepted it. Had he done anything but what he did, I would have been okay with that. But having done nothing, he made the worst possible decision. If this were any level above 9-and 10-year-olds, I would have blown a gasket and been thrown out of the game. I considered such action at the time and decided not to do so.
Having umpired myself up to semi-pro, I know that being the man in blue is a tough job. And from the umps perspective, games like yesterday are no fun. The wind was blowing, the pitching was wild, the game was sloppy. It was the kind of game that helped me decide to do something else with my free time. But the guy that accepts the job owes it to the league and the players to do the job, to call the game fair, to know the rules, and enforce them as best as he can. I did not feel we got fair treatment yesterday.